Friday, October 6, 2017

|Rogerian Argument: Analysis—The AI Debate (IN-CLASS)







In 2014, noted astrophysicist Dr. Stephen Hawking told the BBC, "The primitive forms of artificial intelligence we already have, have proved very useful. But I think the development of full artificial intelligence could spell the end of the human race." Hawking has since been joined in his fear of artificial intelligence (AI) by a chorus of tech luminaries, including Elon Musk and Bill Gates. These critics charge that AI is developing at such a pace that its consequences cannot be fully understood nor anticipated. On the other end of the spectrum, AI proponents argue that the technology has the potential to vastly improve life for humans. AI is not something to fear, they say, but to embrace. Can we find consensus on the development of AI? Is there common ground between those that fear AI and those that embrace it? Using a (six paragraph) Rogerian Argument, outline how their solution bridges the divide between the pro and anti-AI camps.

All evidence to support your solution should come from the following sources (use a minimum of five):

In-class : Fri 10.13


No comments:

Post a Comment